Month: May 2022

Florida’s Simultaneous Death Law

A version of the Uniform Simultaneous Death Act is Florida’s Simultaneous Death Law, which is found in Florida Statute § 732.601.  The Simultaneous Death Law is triggered when two or more people die and there is insufficient evidence concerning when certain individuals have died other than simultaneously. This situation is common in fatal accidents where it is not readily known which individual died first. This law can be important when it comes to figuring out the ownership of joint accounts, which passes to the survivor. HOWEVER, who may be considered the survivor? Therefore, determining the correct beneficiary of a life insurance policy, or who takes under a Last Will and Testament may be difficult unless a legal formula is used.

This law only takes effect when the couple’s Last Wills are silent as to which spouse is presumed to have survived the other, or when the spouses die without an estate plan or Will. Under Florida Statute 732.601(1), “[w]hen title to property or its devolution depends on the priority of death and there is insufficient evidence that the persons have died other than simultaneously, the property of each person shall be disposed of as if that person survived.” 

The foregoing statute also contemplates when two or more beneficiaries are designated to take successively by reason of survivorship, disposition of property held by joint tenants or tenants by the entirety, and insurance policies where the insured and beneficiary both die and there is insufficient evidence that they died otherwise than simultaneously. Consequently, the practical effect of Florida Statute 732.601 is that when two people die and their order of death cannot be readily determined, each person’s property will be treated as if they outlived the other. In other words, if a mother has her son as the primary beneficiary of a life insurance policy and her sister as the contingent beneficiary, and both mother and son perish in a plane crash with no evidence as to order of death, then the policy would be payable to the sister as a contingent beneficiary.

In a probate proceeding, this distinction is particularly important, as contingent beneficiaries may have rights of which they are unaware due to the Simultaneous Death Law. The language contained in a Last Will and Testament, or Trust or policy of insurance can provide differently by their respective terms, but in case of a Simultaneous Death, it may be to one’s advantage to speak to a Florida probate attorney regarding the facts.

Now, what happens to the estates of two spouses who die in close in time to one another? For that matter, what happens if a married couple is killed simultaneously–such as in a car or plane accident–and it is impossible to determine who died first? The answer to these questions depends on Florida law and the terms of each spouse’s individual estate plan documents.

Absent a specific provision in a person’s estate plan or other “governing instrument,” Florida law directs that when “there is insufficient evidence that the persons have died otherwise than simultaneously, the property of each person shall be disposed of as if that person survived.” What that means is that if a person and their spouse die at the same time, then each is presumed to have survived the other for purposes of their respective estate plans.

The foregoing may sound like a contradiction, but it makes sense if one seriously thinks about it in practical terms. For instance, an individual and their spouse each have a Last Will which leaves their entire estate to the other spouse. Under Florida’s simultaneous death rule, each of their respective estates assumes the other spouse died first, therefore, the estates would then go to the alternate beneficiaries, such as children. Absent this rule, each spouse’s estate would go to other spouse’s estate–effectively creating a legal paradox.

The simultaneous death rule also applies to life insurance policies, which means if a person takes out a policy on their own life and their spouse is the named beneficiary, in case of a simultaneous death the spouse is presumed to have died before the subject person. The policy benefits would then go to the alternate or contingent beneficiary named. If no alternate beneficiary is named, then the proceeds go to the estate of the insured.

There are also situations where one may want to impose a “survivorship” requirement on a beneficiary to your estate, including the spouse or another family member. As an example, the Last Will might include language which says no beneficiary may receive a bequest unless they survive you by 30, 60 or 90 days. Again, the reason for this language is to avoid potential issues with multiple estates administering the same property.

Some states impose automatic survivorship periods, typically 120 hours (or 5 days) on all heirs and beneficiaries. Florida does not have such a rule. However, one is still free to require a survivorship period in the Last Will or Trust if they desire, although it should typically not last more than 60 days.

When preparing an estate plan, one can work around the Uniform Simultaneous Death Act if they do not care for the result following its provisions. Consequently, the Last Wills can stipulate that, in case of a simultaneous death, only one of the of the spouses is considered or deemed to have survived the other.

It is important to collaborate with an attorney who understands all aspects of Florida law. Consequently, the form of joint ownership and terms in estate planning documents used will be critical to determining who will benefit in the case of a simultaneous death.

If you should have any additional questions or would like to discuss your situation, concerns, and needs, please call an Attorney at CASERTA & SPIRITI.

Medicaid & Its Look-Back Period in Florida

(A Quick Review)

Florida has a 60-month Medicaid Look-Back Period that immediately precedes one’s Medicaid application date. During this timeframe, Medicaid checks to ensure no assets were gifted or sold under fair market value.

To qualify for long-term Medicaid in Florida, such as nursing home or assisted living care, the applicant must not have given away assets within 5 years of applying for Medicaid benefits. Any gifts or transfers of assets made greater than 5 years of the date of application are not subject to penalties.

Medicaid services in Florida are administered by the Agency for Health Care Administration. Medicaid eligibility in Florida is determined either by the Department of Children and Families (DCF) or the Social Security Administration (for SSI recipients).

In Florida, Medicaid can be used to pay for an elderly relative’s nursing home, assisted living facility, or in-home nursing care. Medicaid pays a fixed daily rate to cover costs such as a patient’s room, meals, staff care, and medical supplies, for the remainder of their life.

In Florida, most Medicaid recipients are enrolled in the Statewide Medicaid Managed Care program. The program has three parts: Managed Medical Assistance, Long-Term Care, and Dental.

The most popular question that arises is -can Florida Medicaid (or AHCA) take one’s house? The basic answer is “no.” If one dies and their home goes to their heirs-at-law (i.e., family members) then the state of Florida cannot take their homestead real property. HOWEVER, Florida Medicaid does have a pay-back provision, just like all states. During one’s lifetime, if they received Medicaid benefits and if they die after age 55, the State of Florida is a creditor in their probate estate.

One of the other biggest concerns is often, “Will the nursing home take my house?” The short answer is no. A nursing home does not take houses. However, there are circumstances where selling the house may be the only way to get the funds to pay for the care that is needed.

Since Medicaid is a needs-based program, this 5-year rule is designed to ensure that applicants need government assistance and did not just position themselves to receive Medicaid benefits just before applying.

To qualify, a single individual over the age of 65 (or disabled), who needs home-health aide, assisted living facility or skilled nursing home Medicaid benefits, he or she can have no more than $2,000.00 in what are considered countable assets for Medicaid.

Exempted assets include personal belongings, household furnishings, an automobile, irrevocable burial trusts, IRAs in payout status, and one’s primary home or residence. For home exemption, the Medicaid applicant must live in it or have the intent to return, and in 2022, have a home equity interest no greater than $636,000.

Effective January 1, 2022, the applicant’s gross monthly income may not exceed $2,523.00 (up from $2,382.00). The applicant may keep $130 per month for personal expenses. However, even having excess income is not necessarily a deal-breaker in terms of Medicaid eligibility.

The most common example of a non-exempt transfer is a gift of an asset to a friend or family member within the prior 60 months of applying for Medicaid benefits.

If an applicant is found to have made a non-exempt transfer during the previously mentioned look-back period, the State of Florida will impose a penalty of ineligibility based on the amount of money that was transferred away.

The length of the penalty of ineligibility is calculated by dividing the amount of money that was given away by the average monthly private-pay nursing home facility cost.

Therefore, to protect a prospective applicant’s assets legally and ethically before the look-back period, an individual must ensure their estate plan is in order and create an Irrevocable Trust for Medicaid purposes, which if done properly, allows protection for both principal and income while allowing the applicant to still qualify for Medicaid long-term care. Several ways to protect money from Medicaid include, but are not limited to, an Asset protection trust, in that Asset protection trusts are set up to protect wealth, Income trusts, Promissory notes and private annuities, Caregiver Agreements or Personal Service Contracts and Spousal transfers, among others.

Assets are not protected from Medicaid in a Revocable Trust because a person retains control of them. The primary benefit of a Revocable Trust is that one can name a beneficiary who will receive payouts from the trust after death without the need of a probate proceeding.

If one is healthy and not looking to receive long-term care in the immediate future, there are several steps that can be taken to better prepare for future needs. Once again, ensure that an estate plan is in order and that a Will and/or Trust is up to date. Further, other needed documents include a valid Durable Power of Attorney (for financial matters), Healthcare Surrogate (medical power of attorney) and Living Will/Advance Directive. An individual can also create an Irrevocable Trust for Medicaid purposes, which if done properly, allows for the protection of both principal and income while allowing the applicant to still qualify for Medicaid long-term care. An individual can obtain long-term care insurance coverage as well. Some private insurance carriers provide options for this type of insurance, but the applicant typically must be healthy at the time of purchase for them to be covered. Financial advisers recommend the optimal age to inquire about a long-term care policy, assuming one is still in good health and eligible for coverage, is between 60 and 65. Couples might consider looking into it 5 years earlier.

The foregoing is just a brief overview or review of the subject described.

If you should have any additional questions or would like to discuss your situation, concerns, and needs, please call an Attorney at CASERTA & SPIRITI.

CRUISE SHIP ACCIDENTS IN FLORIDA (An Overview)

Accidents can occur anywhere. While on vacation, a significant injury might be sustained on a cruise. It is estimated that more than nine million passengers travel on pleasure cruises departing North American ports each year. It has also been reported that, since 2016, there has been an upward trend of accident or negligence cases against cruise lines and that personal injury cases against the three biggest cruise lines, i.e., Carnival, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings accounted for 78 to 87 % of all federal litigation they faced over the past five years.

Common causes of cruise ship injuries, include ship collisions, technical problems, passengers falling overboard, assaults by crew members, food poisoning as well as slip and fall incidents. These acts of negligence can lead to serious injuries such as broken bones, concussions, and internal organ damage. In the event of injury or wrongful death, one can bring a claim or lawsuit against Carnival, Royal Caribbean, Norwegian, or Celebrity Cruise Lines.

First, it is important to clarify that when a person purchases a ticket and boards a cruise ship, they automatically accept the cruise line’s contract. One can typically find this contract in the fine print on the bottom of their ticket. By making the purchase and boarding the ship, an individual legally consents to the terms of the cruise line. This liability waiver can bar injured parties from pursuing certain claims against the various cruise lines. It can also list important claim information, such as deadlines for filing. The contract may state something like, “the cruise line is not liable for any personal injury, illness, or death unless negligent.”

It is also important to know that the contract does not protect the cruise line from every personal injury claim. It is only those that the carrier or cruise line employees had not caused or to which they had not contributed. If one believes the cruise line or one of its employees is guilty of negligence or intent to harm, their case will circumvent the stipulations of the ticket purchase. Otherwise, the subject cruise line on which a person traveled would be free to cause harm or conduct business negligently without fear of legal repercussions. An example would be if the injury was entirely the passenger’s fault or due to their own carelessness, then they will not have a case. Various resulting injuries for which a passenger cannot sue include, but are not limited to, if you drank too much alcohol and tripped down the stairs; if you were fooling around in an area blocked off to guests with proper signage; or did not follow proper instructions and fell, etc.

On the other hand, the type of cruise injuries one can make a claim or sue for are torn carpeting which caused a fall; loose handrail caused a tumble down the stairs; and proper signage was not used to alert guests to avoid an area or use caution. In the foregoing, one might have a premises liability lawsuit against the carrier for failing to properly maintain the cruise ship.

A cruise line lawsuit may also have a foundation in the legal theory of negligence. For instance, this might be the case if the ship’s cook failed to properly refrigerate fish, leading to an outbreak of food poisoning.

A cruise ship owes its passengers a duty of safe transportation. Passengers who are injured aboard a ship may file lawsuit against: the owner of the cruise ship; the company that chartered the cruise ship; the company that operated the cruise ship, and/or the Company that sold the ticket as an agent of the cruise ship owner, charterer, or operator. Each of these claims may be subject to cruise ship laws which affect where and when the passenger may file suit.

The initial hurdle is that personal injury claims against a cruise line company usually require passengers to file them in the same state of the company’s headquarters. In the alternative, there other forum selection clauses. These provisions, also contained in the ticket package, dictate where a lawsuit may be filed against the cruise line. It does not matter where the passenger is from, or where the cruise departed. Currently, cruise lines have limited the location where claims may be brought to a handful of cities where larger ports are located, such as Miami, Seattle, and Los Angeles. This can be an issue for people that live elsewhere, and with many major cruise lines based in Florida such as Royal Caribbean, Celebrity, Carnival, and Norwegian Cruise Lines, or the location designated to bring a lawsuit may be Miami, then a Florida based attorney may be in the best position to represent the injured party and litigate these claims.

Further, most cruise lines also have a notice requirement. That means, if you want to sue them, you must give them formal written notice of your claim within a specific period, usually just a couple of months after the injury or illness is sustained. For injuries occurring due to negligence associated with a cruise line, the contractual provisions typically call for a limited timeframe. More specifically for injuries or deaths stemming from negligence associated with a cruise ship, the contract, which is usually contained in the ticket package, typically provides that a passenger must provide notice of a claim to the cruise line within six months and commence a lawsuit within one year.

Therefore, an added hurdle is that cruise ship accident lawsuits carry a one-year statute of limitations. This limited timeframe combined with the need to file in the same state of the company’s headquarters can create an incredibly tight, inconvenient, and often expensive litigation process for out-of-state passengers injured in a cruise ship accident.

Bringing a lawsuit against a cruise line for onboard injuries requires a different process from personal injury claims on land. Cruise ship injuries involve elements of maritime law, a distinct body of law which governs offenses and activities on water vessels. There are also different filing deadlines and liability concerns one must consider.

Regarding non-physical injury claims, cruise lines impose a shorter limitation period. Most cruise lines require that written claims be filed within days as opposed to months after the accident. Courts may decide not to enforce these limitations if they were unreasonable under the circumstances or contrary to a state statute of limitations.

Maritime laws require plaintiffs to prove fault. A common carrier owes the highest degree of care to its passengers. However, unlike typical strict liability cases, passengers must prove negligence or intent to harm to bring a claim against said cruise line. This involves having evidence of the cruise line’s failure to exercise due care thereby resulting in injury.

As a common carrier, or a vessel that carries passengers for money, cruise ships must obey certain common carrier laws. These laws and rules include providing: adequate fire protection; competent crewmembers; safe and sanitary food services; firefighting and lifesaving equipment; stable watercraft; safe navigation; vessel control; environmental protection; protection from physical harm; safe arrival at the destination; protection from crewmember assaults and/or reasonable search and rescue for missing passengers, among others.

Passengers who sustain injuries due to negligence or intent to harm may be able to recover compensation for their medical bills, pain and suffering, lost time at work, and other damages.

At the time of an accident and shortly thereafter, gather as much information as possible about what happened, such as statements from people who witnessed the incident, names of cruise ship staff members on the scene, photographs of anything relevant to your claim and any other relevant details that may be helpful in the potential case.

If one must go to the onboard hospital for treatment of injuries sustained, then have a friend or family member gather medical as well as other relevant information. As expected, it is vital to record details of the subject incident while they are still fresh in one’s memory.

You must file your lawsuit at the cruise line’s headquarters or as designated on the ticket. Despite being highly inconvenient for passengers who live out of state or even in a different country, cruise ship liability waivers state that injured passengers must file claims in the state of the company’s headquarters or as otherwise designated. In addition, Cruise ship lawsuits are often subject to a one-year statute of limitations. This means that a cause of action must commence within one year or the passenger loses their right to pursue compensation.

Probably, the key factor in a case against a cruise line is the ability to prove negligence. This factor hinges on the court ruling that a “reasonably careful ship operator” would have done something different in the same situation, such as knowing about a faulty staircase railing and taking steps to repair the issue. Although it is impossible for a cruise line company to foresee all dangerous conditions, they have a duty to reasonably prevent harm to passengers.

Finally, report the accident and injuries to the cruise line as soon as possible, not only to receive a possible refund but also to have documented proof that the incident occurred and that it was reported to authorities in a timely manner. Keep a record of the employees or representatives with whom one speaks, what he/she said, and how the cruise line responded to the subject incident and injuries.

If there are any additional QUESTIONS regarding the foregoing matters, contact or call the Attorneys at CASERTA & SPIRITI before an unfortunate and unexpected accident occurs and after to discuss the details of your case!!

MOTHER’S DAY-A Little Law & A Little History

There are over 1,500 national holidays. On May 8, 1914, the United States Congress passed a law designating the second Sunday in May as Mother’s Day. Specifically, President Woodrow Wilson signed a bill designating the second Sunday in May as a legal holiday to be called “Mother’s Day” …dedicated “to the best mother in the world, your mother.” It is the second largest consumer spending holiday in the United States according to the National Retail Federation. 

The creation of a national Mother’s Day is attributed to three women, i.e., Ann Reeves Jarvis, Julia Ward Howe, and Ann’s daughter, Anna M. Jarvis.

Eventually, Anna Jarvis from Philadelphia wished to memorialize her mother’s life and started campaigning for a national day to honor all mothers.

Her efforts came to fruition, when in May of 1907, Anna Jarvis memorialized her mother’s lifelong activism with a memorial service held at the Methodist Church in Grafton, West Virginia, where Anna’s mother had taught. The following year, on May 10th, a Mother’s Day service was held at that same church to acknowledge all mothers. Consequently, the idea that the second Sunday in May be set aside to honor every mother, whether living or deceased, was born.

Ms. Jarvis’s efforts came to the attention of the mayor of Philadelphia, who proclaimed a local Mother’s Day. While West Virginia was the first state to officially adopt the holiday, others followed suit.

From the local and state levels, Ms. Jarvis later traveled to Washington, D.C. where federal politicians lent verbal support.

Proclamation of the day by the various states spurred Representative J. Thomas Heflin of Alabama and Senator Morris Sheppard of Texas to present a joint resolution to Congress that Mother’s Day be observed nationwide. The resolution was passed by both houses.

Historically, the tradition dates to pagan celebrations in ancient Greece in honor of Rhea, the mother of the gods. In Rome, as well, Cybele, a mother of goddesses, was worshipped as early as 250 B.C. In the 17th Century, England celebrated a day called “Mothering Sunday” on the fourth Sunday of Lent.

One can include their mother-in-law on this date as well. However, National Mother-in-Law Day, which is modeled after Mother’s Day, is officially celebrated on the fourth Sunday in October. That occasion honors the other mother in many people’s lives. Gene Howe, the editor of an Amarillo, Texas newspaper, started the holiday in honor of mothers-in-law. It was first celebrated on March 5, 1934, in Amarillo, Texas. 

Through the years, celebrants observed the occasion on various days. In later years, the Mother-in-Law Day Committee developed and selected honorees each year. Then in the 1970s, the American Society of Florists proclaimed the last Sunday in October to be National Mother-In-Law-Day. Since that time, the date has been observed accordingly.

The foregoing is merely a summary of the holiday. If you should have any legal concerns or issues, please call the attorneys at the law firm of CASERTA & SPIRITI.

MEMORANDUM AS TO DISPOSITION OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY ATTACHED TO A FLORIDA WILL

A Memorandum as To Disposition of Tangible Personal Property is a document made part of a Last Will & Testament and makes specific gifts of the deceased’s or testator’s tangible personal property to take effect at death and can be handwritten by said person without the need of an attorney’s assistance. As stated therein, the Memorandum shall have no significance apart from its effect on the disposition of the subject individual’s property by the aforementioned Will and shall be attached to and kept for safekeeping with such Will. The person creating the Will expressly reserves the right to revoke or alter the Memorandum at any time prior to death and does not intend by this Memorandum to create any rights, whether by anticipation or otherwise, in any of the persons mentioned herein as testamentary donees or beneficiaries of the subject individual’s property. In other words, it is a supplemental document that must be referenced in the Will or living trust and allows one to specify the items of personal property they wish to leave to loved ones. A properly prepared personal property memorandum will be specifically referenced in one’s trust or Last Will and will be prepared in the testator’s own (preferably legible) handwriting and signed. It could be typed as well. No witness or notary signatures are required. The memorandum can be revised, amended, or replaced as often as the testator desires.

The role of this document in Florida Estate Planning is to reduce the risk of family conflict by preparing a personal property memorandum as a supplement to one’s Will. A personal property memorandum, which is merely a signed list identifying specific items and intended recipients, provides a means of clearly describing who gets what. In doing so, the memorandums become an important safeguard against estate or family conflict.

When it comes to preparing a personal property memorandum in Florida estate planning, one cannot just write out a list of whom a person wants to receive particular items and expect it to be enforced by a Florida probate court. A personal property memorandum needs to satisfy certain requirements set forth by statute, Fla. Stat. §732.515.  One first needs a valid Florida Last Will & Testament (or trust instrument), which mentions one’s intention to create and incorporate a separate list of tangible personal property. The said memorandum or list can be the last page of the Will or trust or a separate document.

In order to be effective, a personal property memorandum must be signed by the testator (i.e., the individual whose Will is being supplemented). Florida’s personal property memorandum statute does not technically require the list to be dated, but dating is a better idea, as it tends to avoid confusion if the list is amended or revised later. More importantly, a personal property memorandum must also identify with reasonable certainty the items to be distributed and the individuals who will receive them. One needs to ensure each individual item and beneficiary can be readily identified without any further explanation.

One of the biggest advantages of using a MEMORANDUM AS TO DISPOSITION OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTYis that it can be amended without going through all the formalities for creation of a Will or codicil. Consequently, if a person acquires new personal property or transfers existing property (or just changes their mind about the disposition), they can alter or revise the memorandum later on. In the alternative, they can just write up a new memorandum to supersede an earlier version, which is one of the reasons it is important to date the document.

However, if the actual Last Will and Memorandum both happen to include the same item, the Florida Probate Code says that the subject Will takes precedence even though the Memorandum was created later.

In Florida (as well as most other states that allow them), these memorandums can only be used to distribute “tangible personal property.”  Therefore, their use excludes real estate since real estate is not personal property. â€œTangible” means things that you can hold or touch, i.e., trinkets, antiques, clothing, jewelry, furniture, musical instruments, possibly firearms, and possibly pets.

HOWEVER, one may not be able to simply give a beneficiary a firearm as stated in a Will. There are situations in which their taking possession of the firearm or gun would be illegal, such as if they are a convicted felon. The same can be said for the personal representative’s or executor’s possession of the firearm. The personal representative is not exempt from the law, because they are acting on behalf of an estate. If one is not entitled to possess a gun, then speak with a specialized attorney with experience in firearms immediately about ensuring the firearms are stored in a lawful place during the probate process. As a personal representative, carefully review the decedent’s estate planning documents, including whether they have a gun trust, and speak with an experienced probate attorney before doing anything with the decedent’s firearms. Numerous federal and state laws regulate the sale or transfer of firearms, making the gifting process complicated. One cannot convey a gun improperly or to an unlawful recipient, which may violate the law. Further, if the decedent did not plan for how their guns were to be handled, the personal representative will need to know how to dispose of them properly and legally. The foregoing requires a more in-depth discussion, which may be dealt with at a later time.

On the other hand, â€œintangible” property cannot be distributed using a personal property memorandum. Accordingly, items such as bank or investment accounts, securities, insurance policies, and intellectual property are excluded. Also, cash does not qualify as “tangible” personal property. Promissory notes or other evidence of indebtedness do not qualify as well.

Another exception built into Florida law applies to property “used in business or trade,” which is not eligible for inclusion in a personal property memorandum. Said regulation means that certain items might be includable in one context but not in another. Tools you keep in the garage for household projects can probably be included in said memorandum, but those same tools might be ineligible if you use them in a business endeavor.

One of the most valuable personal property items that most people own, i.e., motor vehicles, should not be listed in the subject memorandum. The reason being those motor vehicles have certificates of title, and a vehicle’s title is what determines who owns it. Again, since a vehicle or boat has a certificate of title, it would be preferred to include said items in the Last Will or a Florida revocable trust.  When the time comes, the personal representative or trustee signs over the title to the beneficiary. One can arrange to transfer an asset outside Florida probate through some type of joint ownership with a right of survivorship.  When an asset is jointly owned with a right of survivorship, full title or ownership automatically vests with a surviving co-owner upon the other owner’s death.

Even if there is no title, one can better dispose of particularly valuable personal property through a Will rather than the aforesaid memorandum even though the subject item qualifies as “tangible personal property.”  An attested Will provides more certainty and is less susceptible to ambiguity or tampering than a Memorandum, which can be informally revised. Therefore, if a person’s estate includes heirloom jewelry, for example, which might be considered expensive, it might be preferable to address it within the actual Will. If one is unsure whether an item is appropriate for a personal property memorandum, one should discuss it with an experienced Florida estate planning attorney.

A Florida personal property memorandum does not need to be a sophisticated legal document. A memorandum should have a brief description clearly identifying the document’s purpose, the date and the testator’s signature, and a list of items and beneficiaries. Each item needs to be described with certainty and beneficiaries should be sufficiently identified including the full legal names of recipients to eliminate any confusion. 

One of the primary purposes of any estate plan is to avoid family conflict.  Most estate plans adequately address large assets, but the smaller personal items may cause conflict. In Florida, incorporating a memorandum of personal property into the Last Will & Testament, which distributes tangible items with sentimental or some economic value, and which may not be included in the Will itself, is an effective way to avoid future battles among family members.

If you should have any additional questions or would like to discuss your situation, concerns, and needs, please call an Attorney at CASERTA & SPIRITI.